Click here to advertise

 

Humanscape Magazine | Voluntary Organisations | Weblinks | Manavta Kendra | About Us | Chat | Recommend HumanscapeIndia
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


VOL. X ISSUE X OCTOBER 2003

 

Other articles in this issue


A conversation about a conversation

The price of progress
Neela D’Souza & Jennifer Mirza

Who’s afraid of biodiversity?
Meena Menon

Food for thought
Manu N Kulkarni

Making a difference
Manju Menon & Kanchi Kohli

A green thought in a green shade
Keya Acharya

Trapping water the traditional way
Ranjan Panda


Small steps ahead
Asha George

Refractive Index

Human Index


About Humanscape Magazine

Editorial Humanscape Features

Click here to subscribe to Humanscape print magazine

Click here to advertise

Back to Humanscape Magazine

| Humanscape News |

Subscribe to Humanscape news by email


Click here to advertise


| Sign our Guest Book |


Leave your comments and feedback to our website here


Killing them slowly

The Nalgonda uranium project has serious health concerns


On one side, managers of uranium mines lure poor inhabitants with jobs. On the other, the invisible radioactive radon gas lurks in the mines to sign death warrants by lung cancer for the mining workers. Ignorance of atomic radiation coupled with an eagerness to improve their standard of life has made many all over the world victims of uranium mining. This is in addition to the irreparable damage to the environment. In the end, around the abandoned mines, generations are doomed to lead lives of pain and misery. The story has been the same in several parts of the world, as it always is when the US is concerned. Navajo Indians in the midst of Navajo reservations that stretch from New Mexico into Arizona and the aboriginal Canadians in Canada’s north-western areas of Saskatchewan and Ontario and in other continents, all have been at the receiving end of the superpower’s greed. Now it commences for a second time in India in the Nalgonda district of Andhra Pradesh in south India, while the first instance in India is more or less complete in and around the uranium fields of Jaduguda in Jharkhand in the north.
Uranium mining is known to be hazardous. Apart from the usual risks of mining, uranium miners worldwide have experienced a much higher incidence of lung cancer and other lung diseases. There are several studies indicating an increased incidence of skin cancer, stomach cancer and kidney disease among uranium miners. Uranium is the heaviest metal that occurs in nature. It is an unstable material that gradually breaks apart or ‘decays’ at the atomic level. Any such material is said to be radioactive. As uranium slowly decays, it gives off invisible bursts of penetrating energy called ‘atomic radiation’. It also produces more than a dozen other radioactive substances as by-products. These unstable by-products, having little or no commercial value, are known as ‘uranium decay products’. They are discarded as waste when uranium is mined. One of them is a toxic radioactive gas called radon. The others are radioactive solids.

Core issues

The core issues of uranium mining and processing are:

  • Uranium and its decay products buried deep in the earth are brought to surface and radon gas produced in the mine causes lung cancer

  • Leftover piles of materials or ‘uranium tailings’ contain over a dozen radioactive materials. There is no perfect storage of these radioactive materials to prevent them from finding their way into the soil, water, plants, animals, fish and humans

 License

On 18 February 2003, the minister for mines and geology, A Uma Madhava Reddy,  government of Andhra Pradesh, said in the Legislative Assembly that the atomic minerals division of Uranium Corporation of India Limited (UCIL), having found deposits of uranium to the order of 11.02 million tonnes in Peddagattu area of PA Palli mandal of Nalgonda district, had applied for a mining lease covering Lambapur and Peddagattu areas, and that it was being processed. The corporation, she also said, wanted to establish a hydro-metallurgical plant for processing the ore. Uranium deposits are also reported to be present in Srikakulam and Visakhapatnam districts.
On 20 August 2003, the chief minister N Chandrababu Naidu publicly stated that a decision will be taken only after evaluating all aspects including employment opportunities against the damage to the environment and after allowing sufficient understanding to develop in the minds of people. This assurance by the chief minister is encouraging. Therefore, there is a need to examine the question: Is it in the public interest to grant license to Nalgonda uranium project?
The UCIL is moving all concerned quarters to obtain a license to extract uranium ore from the Lambapur and Peddagutta reserves in Nalgonda district. The corporation has estimated that the two reserves have about 11.02 million tonnes of uranium (ore) deposits spread in 536 hectares land. UCIL plans to commence mining over 400 hectares of the Rayaram reserve forest and to set up a uranium ore processing plant near Mallapuram village in the PA Palli mandal just three kilometres away from the Azmapuram reserve forest. It has, reportedly, proposed to invest about Rs 450 crore (US$ 96 million) for setting up the plant. According to estimates, the UCIL proposed to generate about 1,250 tonnes of ore per day for 20 to 25 years.
Senior officials of the forest department voiced their concern that the Lambapur-Peddagattu uranium mining project in Andhra Pradesh is spread over the reserve forest in violation of the provisions of the Forest Act, and the uranium processing plant is less than six kilometres from the Nagarjuna tiger reserve, and it violates the provision of Indian Wildlife Act which disallows industrial activity within 25 kilometres of a notified sanctuary. Mining, being an activity capable of increasing noise levels, environmentalists are seized with the apprehension that the project, if it takes shape, will drive away the wildlife in the area. The tiger reserve and the adjoining reserve forest is home to tigers, bears, several species of deer and other animals.
There are four areas with promising uranium deposits: the Singhbhum district (Bihar), West Khasi hills (Meghalaya), the Bhima Basin area (Gulbarga district of Karnataka), and the Yellapur-Peddagattu area of Nalgonda district (Andhra Pradesh). Having failed to obtain a license in other areas, the UCIL is pressing for it in Nalgonda. In Meghalaya, UCIL faced opposition from the local Khasi tribe which has so far prevented UCIL from developing a commercial uranium mine at Domiasiat in the north-eastern province of Meghalaya. A senior UCIL official said in May 2003, “Every time we turn up at the uranium mines at the Domiasiat uranium project in Meghalaya, the tribe’s people chase us with bows and arrows and swords…They call us the agents of death and threaten to kill us if we try to mine uranium.”

Uranium tailings

During mining, the uranium and its decay products buried deep in the earth are brought to the surface, and the rock containing them is crushed into fine sand. After the uranium is chemically removed, the sand is stored in huge reservoirs. These leftover piles of radioactive sand or uranium tailings contain over a dozen radioactive materials, which are all extremely harmful to all life forms on earth. The most serious of these are thorium-230, radium-226, radon-222 (radon gas) and the radon progeny including polonium-210. If this radioactive sand is left on the surface and is allowed to dry out, it can blow in the wind and be deposited on vegetation far away, entering the food chain. Or it can wash into rivers and lakes and contaminate them.
Thorium-230 is the uranium decay product with the longest lifetime. It lasts for hundreds of thousands of years – in human terms, forever. Thorium is especially toxic to the liver and the spleen. It has been known to cause leukaemia and other blood diseases. It decays to produce radium-226, which in turn produces radon gas (radon-222).
So the amount of radium in the waste and the quantities of radon gas produced by it will not diminish for a long time, because they are constantly being replenished by the decay of the very long-lived thorium-230.
Radium-226 is one of the more dangerous uranium decay products. It is a radioactive heavy metal and a potent alpha emitter. As it decays, it produces radon gas as a by-product. Radium is chemically similar to calcium, and, when ingested, it migrates to the bones, the teeth and the milk. It is readily taken up by vegetation. In aquatic plants, it can be concentrated by factors of hundreds or even thousands.
Radon-222 is a toxic gas created by the decay of radium-226. Most of the radon is normally trapped in the ore-bearing rock deep within the earth. But when the rock is excavated and crushed, a lot of radon gas is released into the air. The uranium miners breathe this radioactive gas into their lungs. Radon (the gas and its progeny) is a very powerful cancer-causing agent. Even small doses inhaled repeatedly over a long time can cause lung cancer.
Uranium tailings constantly produce large amounts of radon gas through the decay of radium in the tailings. This gas can travel thousands of kilometres with a light breeze in just a few days. As it travels, it continually deposits solid radon progeny on the ground, water and vegetation below. Radon also dissolves readily in water and can be transported by ground-water into wells and streams.

Radioactive radon gas decays, producing seven radioactive decay products called “radon progeny”. These solid radioactive materials attach themselves to tiny dust particles and droplets of water vapour floating in the air.

Jadugoda

In the past four decades, after uranium mining started in our country, thousands have died due to lack of adherence to basic safety standards considered mandatory to uranium mining. The tribal population in villages around Jadugoda, Narwapahar and Bhatin uranium mines of UCIL are victims of radiation. Near the Jadugoda mine, an independent study by experts recorded the yearly dose of nuclear radiation exposure 58 times more than the allowed international standard of 100 millirem. An environment committee of Bihar legislative council, headed by Gautam Sagar Rana, had pointed out in its report the health hazards to which miners working in the uranium mines and the tribals (residing close to the tailing ponds used for dumping of nuclear wastes) are exposed. Children in the 15 villages surrounding the uranium mines show signs of genetic mutation and over 60 per cent of the workers manning the tailing ponds are afflicted with serious ailments like bone, blood and kidney disorders, brain damage, cancer, paralysis, tuberculosis and nausea. 

In conclusion

  • Nuclear issues in India are treated as something quite out of purview of the ordinary citizen, which can only be comprehended by a select group. This is the main reason the public in India has been so passive about the risks of nuclear technology.

  • An environment impact assessment undertaken by UCIL on the Nalgonda uranium project requires a thorough examination. It will be of no use if the examination is left to people who thrive on grants and favours from the department of atomic energy.

  • Nalgonda uranium project has many dangers in store for the people of Nalgonda district and other areas in Andhra Pradesh as radioactive material is bound to enter the soil, water, plants, animals, fish and even humans resulting in irreparable damage.

  • It is irrational not to separate nuclear weapon pursuit from that of nuclear power for producing electricity. This irrationality has resulted in starving funds for hydropower projects and alternate sources of clean energy from solar, wind and ocean waves. The hydropower plants and projects to store surface water would not only give electric power but would also result in drinking water, navigation and fishery.

The people of Nalgonda cannot be left to become victims of irrational plans aiming to achieve 20,000 MW of electricity from nuclear power by the year 2020. Nalgonda uranium project is anti-people.

Buddhi Kota Subbarao, PhD in nuclear technology, is a former Indian Navy captain and Supreme Court advocate. He can be contacted at bksubbarao@vsnl.com

 

  

Send this page to your friends

Copyright ©Foundation for Humanisation. All Rights Reserved

 

 by Buddhi Kota Subbarao

Photo by: Down to Earth


Unearthing danger
: Radio-active material find their way into the soil

Lung cancer

There are several studies to show higher rates of lung cancer among uranium miners.
In 1976, an Ontario Royal Commission – the Ham Commission – found that 81 Canadian uranium miners had died from lung cancer. That was twice as many as expected. By the end of 1977, the number had risen to 119; by the end of 1981, the toll was 174; and by the end of 1984, it was 274. A 1980 report from the British Columbia Medical Association said that we must anticipate “a gradually-flowering crop of (radiation-induced) cancers” among the uranium mining population. There are many current research studies of hard rock miners exposed to radon and its progeny in Europe, the US and Canada, all showing clearly increased lung cancer rates. The amount of cancer is dependent on the radiation exposure of the miners; the higher the exposure, the greater the number of cancer deaths. Significant increases in lung cancer due to radiation have been observed in both smokers and non-smokers.
Safe level of exposure to radon?
According to the latest available facts admitted to by British Nuclear Regulatory Board, there is no such thing as a ‘safe dose’ of nuclear radiation. Repeated low levels of exposure are proportionately more dangerous than exposure to a single massive dose. Nowhere in the world has the nuclear industry been able to demonstrate that it can safely deal with the highly dangerous wastes that are inevitable consequences of nuclear fuel cycle.
In the early eighties, an independent scientific study on the risks of radon was published by the Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB – the body that sets standards for radiation exposure in Canada). This study, known as the Thomas/MacNeill Report, reviewed all available evidence from several countries. It concluded that the risks are very high.
The Ham Commission warned that using more miners for shorter times, without reducing the total exposure to inhaled radon, will not reduce the number of cancer victims. If anything, it could increase the number of excess lung cancers.
The Ham Commission Report, Thomas/MacNeill Report, and the 1988 BEIR-IV Report (by the US National Research Council) have all pointed out that at lower radon exposure levels the number of cancers caused per unit dose may actually increase. In other words, spreading the same total dose out over a larger population, so that each individual gets a smaller dose, may increase the total number of cancers caused. The BEIR IV Report observes that this phenomenon is well known for laboratory animals.
Water pollution
During routine mine and milling operations, radioactive substances and other chemical contaminants (including sulphuric acid) will escape into the water. In Ontario, Canada, the entire Serpent River system – including more than a dozen lakes – were severely contaminated for 55 miles downstream from the uranium mines in the Elliot Lake area by the late seventies. At that time, the International Joint Commission identified the Serpent River system as the largest single contributor of radium contamination to the Great Lakes. In case of a failure of the containment system for tailings, rivers and lakes can be ruined completely as a source of water for humans and animals. In the Elliot Lake area, there have been over thirty tailings dam failures.
On 16 July 1979, just after five o’clock in the morning, a new tailings dam built with the latest technology suddenly collapsed in Churchrock, New Mexico, USA; the resulting spill was the greatest accidental release of radioactive material into the environment prior to the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986. The dam holding waste material (uranium tailings) from the neighbouring uranium refinery (uranium milling unit) burst, causing a huge mass of radioactive mud to pour into the 100-feet wide Puerco River, a tributary of the Colorado. Following the accident, high concentrations of radium, uranium, and other substances were detected in the river and well water, making it too dangerous to drink. Since then a pipe has brought water from a lake twenty-five miles away, and from the outlet it is carried in buckets to the seven hundred households in the river valley. However, this does not guarantee total safety; livestock has become contaminated by drinking water from the river, posing a considerable risk to local consumers.
At Key Lake in Saskatchewan, Canada, there were more than half a dozen radioactive spills within six months of the mine's starting operations in 1985. The main problem at Key Lake is that the tailings area is too small, even though it is a modern mine.

Liberal Times