Humanscape Topsites

 

Home Humanscape Features Humanscape News Voluntary Organisations Message Board  
Weblinks Manavta Kendra  About Us 
Chat Recommend HumanscapeIndia

100 issues old

VOL. IX ISSUE III MARCH 2002

 

Chased by development

by P Sainath

Meeting Point

Introduction

Humanscape-ist recalls

In praise of communication: art and its discontents
Ranjit Hoskote

“Why don’t you talk about real problems?”
Meher Pestonji

And the twain shall meet
Kumar Ketkar

Manipur: the siege within
Sanjoy Ghose

India: at the crossroads
Makrand Paranjape

A question of balance
Raju Z Moray

Limbu Bhosle’s crime
Rupa Chinai

The never-ending story of consumption
Darryl D’Monte

The arrow of intention
Jayesh Shah

Ravaged by neglect
Meena Menon

A brief history of environmental journalism
Ramachandra Guha

Corporate angels
Rajni Bakshi

The river is our river
Sunny Sebastian

Slavery is alive and well
Kathyayini Chamaraj

Saving themselves
Lionel Messias

The best of Human Index


Click here to Subscribe to Humanscape print magazine

Editorial Humanscape Features

Search Articles

Back To Humanscape Features

Click to advertise here

 

 

CHIKAPAR  (Koraput): Mukta Kadam wept as she herded her five children in front of her, luggage on their heads, leading them through a jungle in darkness and rain. Her village, Chikapar, had been acquired for the MiG project of the Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL) and her family was evicted on an angry monsoon night.

"We didn't know where to go. We just went because the saab log told us to go. It was terrifying. I was so frightened for the children on that night," she   recalls.  That was in 1968. Mukta, a Gadaba tribal, didn't know then that she, along with her entire village of 400-500 large joint families, would have to go through the same experience two more times.

Chikapar is like almost any other village on the Koraput map.  Almost. Perhaps no other village anywhere has the dubious distinction of being targeted for displacement three times. In the late '60s, it was the MiG project. In 1987, Chikapar residents, many of whom had not even received the compensation  due  from   the  first  eviction,   were dishoused  from  their  second  location  --  which,  too,   they  had nostalgically named Chikapar.

This time, Mukta wended her way down the road to   nowhere with a grandchild.  "Once again, it was raining, we took shelter under a bridge   and stayed there for some days," says she. "This   time   (in   1987)," says Arjan Pamja, also from the same tribe, "we had to make way for the Upper Kolab multipurpose project   and   the   naval  ammunition depot."

And now, the villagers, who have reorganised Chikapar once more   in several   little  pockets  in  yet  another  area   after  the  second uprooting,  have  received  eviction  notices  for   the  third  time. Chikapar is being chased by development.

Jagannath  Kadam,  one  of the village's few educated  members,  is  a  school teacher who works in  another village (there has been no  proper school  in Chikapar for  years). He says, "The reasons being given for the third eviction vary. Minister Harish Chandra Bakshi Patra, said at a public meeting here that we had to make way for a poultry   farm. Another explanation is that the present set-up of the village poses problems for the Military Engineering Service (MES) in the area.   We don't know. We only know that the villagers are receiving eviction notices."

If the latter reason is true, says one official, "Little Chikapar will have, in succession, taken on the air force, the navy and the army. If it weren't so tragic, it would be almost comical. And all in the name of development."

Jagannath  Kadam  stayed on in what might be  called  Chikapar-2,  the village's  location after it was evicted the first time to  facilitate the MiG project, but before its eviction for the Upper Kolab  project.  The waters of the Kolab did not quite reach his house, so he defied orders and stayed put. "Since my family has been   alone   here, we've   had to face dacoities, but I'm not leaving again," he   says firmly.

Chikapar was not a village of very poor people. They comprised Gadaba and Paroja tribals, some Doms (Harijans) and a few OBCs.  Originally located in Sunabeda  (literally translated as golden land), the villagers owned big tracts of land. "My joint family of seven owned 129 acres in 1963," says Balram Patro. "Of these, we were compensated for 95 acres only and got a total of Rs 28,000   many, many years later.  But there was no help with house sites, materials or any kind of rehabilitation," he says.

"My family owned 60 acres of land,'' say Jyotirmoy Khora,  "and  we got  Rs 15,000 - Rs  150  per  acre of hilly land and Rs 450 per  acre of  Class I land. Again, the money came much later. And that was it: not a single paisa towards rehabilitation, not even a home site."

"They promised   us   one   job  per  house,   one   home  for  each displaced family," says Narendra Patro, speaking to us at what can  be called Chikapar-3. "People did not even resist on either occasion, but the authorities went back on every assurance."

Less than 15 people  found  employment, at very menial levels, in HAL. Another group made it, with some difficulty, as casual labourers  with no  security   of   tenure. Khora, despite being the  village's  first matriculate in 1970, and  obtaining a diploma of  proficiency  from  a technical training school, remained unemployed for eight years  before finding   a  placement  with  HAL.  Even  for  casual  labour, "the contractors  always bring people from outside," says Madan Khasla,   a  Harijan,  "and the recruiting agents want  payments from us for  other jobs,  but  what money do we have? We have lost our homes twice, but they want us to go yet again."

The revenue inspector of Sunabeda, Purnachandra Parida, confirmed that  eviction  notices   had  been  issued for the third  time.  "They  are encroachers and must go," he said.

Khora laughed when told of the inspector's assertion: "Each time  this village  has  been shifted we have moved, mostly, to  our  own  lands. Remember,  we owned a lot of acres in this region. They have  made  us  encroachers on our own land by declaring it the property of the state.  If  the government declared your house as its property tomorrow,   you would be an encroacher in  your own home, too."

When  the villagers of  Chikapar  village found that they  were to  be evicted  for a record third time, they weren't quite sure what to  do. "What  can  we  do?" asks Pammia Das, a  Gadaba  tribal,  in  despair, "Wherever we go,  some  project  will come up and we will have to move again."

Actually, the problem is even more complex.  This  twice-evicted village  is unlikely to receive any compensation at  all when it  is uprooted for a third time to make way for either a poultry farm  or  a Military Engineering Service depot.

"Even  in  our  second  location," says Pakalu Kadam,  also  a  Gadaba  tribal, "We have been told we are occupying land illegally.  Actually, this  is  our  land.  But they want us to  vacate  in  60  days.   Our ownership  was  never recognised on record. So we have no  rights,  no domicile certificate, not even caste certificates."

But,  asks Jyotirmoy  Khora, "What  happened to the over 400  hectares they took from Chikapar in the '60s and the thousands of acres from 17 other villages?" In the '60s too, Mr Biju  Patnaik was chief  minister "and  he had this grand idea that all the units of HAL would  come  to Koraput." So huge tracts of land were acquired towards that project.

In  fact,  nothing of the sort happened. The other units  came  up  in  Bangalore and elsewhere. As a result, much of the land forcibly  taken over  from the 18 villages remains unutilised to this day.  "They  are neither  returning  the land, nor leasing it for cultivation.  We  are prepared to pay such ‘compensation' as we received if we get back  our land," says Khora.

That, however, seems unlikely to happen. "I can't move again, let them do   what  they  like," says  Mukta  Kadam, the oldest woman  in  the village  and   one of  the  first  to be evicted  in 1968.  "Why  does this always have to happen to  us?"

Possibly  because they are Adivasis and Harijans and because  this  is Koraput, which includes some of the poorest parts of the country  (two of which have emerged as new districts).

When  the National Aluminium Company Ltd. (NALCO) came up in 1981   in Koraput,  more  than 47.7 per cent  of the  2,500  displaced  families  were  tribals  and 9.3 per cent were Harijans, points out  Prof   LK Mahapatra,    former   vice-chancellor   of   Utkal   and    Sambalpur Universities. Over 55 per cent of the 3,067 families displaced by  the  upper  Kolab project belonged to either Scheduled Tribes or  Scheduled Castes.

The  Machkund  hydro-electric   project   in   Koraput  district   had displaced almost 3,000 families by 1960.  Of these, 51.1 per cent were adivasis  and  10.2 per cent were Dalits. "It is a pity,"  notes  Prof Mahapatra   in  a  major study on the subject,  that  "out  of 2938 families displaced, only 600 were rehabilitated, including 450  tribal  families.  Not a single Scheduled Caste family was rehabilitated." The list of such victims in  Orissa is endless. Of nearly 22 million people across the country estimated to have been direct victims of displacement since independence, over 40 per cent are tribals.  In Orissa, that figure is probably much higher, though clear estimates are hard to come by.

At the national level, less than 25 per cent of those displaced   by development have been rehabilitated in the past four decades.   Again, the scenario in Orissa is probably worse.  Within this depressing picture, Koraput plumbs the depths. In a study funded by the Union ministry of welfare, Walter Fernandes and Anthony S Raj, of the Indian Social Institute, New Delhi, note that in Koraput, "around one lakh  tribals  have been deprived of their land,  including  1.6  lakh hectares  of forests on which they had till then depended  for   their livelihood.

"More than six per cent of the district population, a majority of them tribals, have been displaced (by projects). This trend seems   to continue even today."

In Sunabeda  (literally, `Lands of Gold') region alone, since the disintegration of Chikapar began, "nearly 5,000 families or 40,000 people have been displaced by different projects," says Jyotirmoy Khora. "And all promises of rehabilitation have proved false."

The   process   of   displacement   has   been   accompanied   by the disintegration of many families and the destitution of thousands. "Many people couldn't take the waiting period for the compensation and just went away elsewhere to survive," says Kanum Gadaba.

"When the refugees from erstwhile East Pakistan came into Orissa in the  `60s and again in '71," says Jyotirmoy Khora, "nearly a lakh of rupees was spent on the benefit of each one. Less than Rs 15,000   was  given   to  whole  joint  families who belonged here and  were  losing land, not gaining it like the refugees. Better to be a refugee."

Meanwhile, the various fragments of Chikapar await their third displacement   -- some individuals have apparently already been evicted.  Whether for a poultry farm, or the depot, or yet another development project, nobody seems to know for sure.

"Whatever it maybe," says Khora, "basically, they don't want us to be around like an eyesore, sticking out here, telling our tales of woe to others -- especially the minister, if he ever comes.

"They have got their development and the land.  We have got no development, not even a proper school, and have lost our lands," he adds.

And so, the `Golden Lands' await their gloomy harvest.

P Sainath is a leading development writer and author based in Mumbai. The author was awarded the Humanscape Award for his reportage on the 10 poorest districts in India, reported from Chikapar in Orissa where the villagers were being displaced for the third time.

Article reproduced from Humanscape, September 1994

Click here to Subscribe to Humanscape print magazine

Give online comments for this article

Send this article to your friend

Click here to view comments given by readers

Back to humanscape features

Print this article

Click to advertise here

Copyright ©Foundation For Humanization. All Rights Reserved

When the villagers of Chikapar village found that they were to be evicted for a record third time, they weren't quite sure what to do. "What can we do?" asks Pammia Das, a Gadaba tribal, in despair, "Wherever we go, some project will come up and we will have to move again."